On Full Contact with Erik Rush Monday, Conservative conspiracy theorist Jim Garrow shared some ‘inside information’ that he received recently from “reliable” sources which explains the temporary deal reached with Iran on their nuclear program. It was all a distraction to prevent us from finding out that the President had just had another of his “false flag” operations thwarted by three high level military officers who bravely sacrificed their careers to “save” us all from the Fascist, Communist, Socialist, Muslim, Jew illegally occupying the Oval Office.
It seems that the President ordered that three nukes be delivered to him so that he could detonate them and create an EMP (electro magnetic pulse) which would wipe out all electronic devices in the nation creating a crisis which would benefit George Soros who has bet against the U.S. dollar and would make a killing when it’s value fell to zero.
Of course these sources had to be protected so he could not name them, although he doesn’t say what he is protecting them from, since he says that their careers are over which would mean that the government would already know who they were and what they have done making it unclear what it is that he is protecting them from.
The claim also ignores the fact that an EMP does not require a nuke, a nuclear explosion does emit an EMP but one can be created in other ways. Lightening bolts for example emit an EMP.
Garrow said, “People were looking and had started looking at this whole notion that there could have been this EMP event being planned, 300 million people would have died within a year if it hadn’t been for these three individuals who took a bullet, basically a career bullet, a career ending bullet, and maybe a life ending bullet, we’ll have to see, we will have to safeguard them by getting the details out there.”
Of course he does not offer us any of those details. Possibly because he hasn’t invented them yet.
Moving on the pair sang the praises of former general Paul Vallely who spoke in support of Larry Klayman’s “second American revolution” at the wildly successful rally he held last week drawing
thousands hundreds of like minded “patriots.”
Garrow said that it is entirely appropriate to call for revolution and the forced removal of the President.
“If in fact this man is doing the things he is reported to be doing, he needs to be removed, he needs to be in fact tried for treason and of course the finality of that is a man either gets put up against a wall and shot or hung. Treason is not to be stood for — ever– and that’s what we have right now in the White House.”
He goes on to say that the military and former military are not talking about the nukes because they have left it to him to get the word out about things like that. A statement such as that sounds an awful lot like a conspiracy to commit treason, as long as we are on the subject.
Rush replies that the President is a con artist and actor who knows that if his plotting fails he is facing execution and that he would surely face that penalty, “should we succeed, should these things come out and be widely known.”
He goes on to note that Vallely has said that impeachment is not the way to go in their efforts to remove this President, and that the way to go about it is to make sure that he doesn’t get anything done. He says:
“…Those in Congress, right up to the Speaker and the Senate Minority Leader and all of those folks, action has to be taken and making things essentially not work, they will not be able to get anything done for all of the political upheaval.”
Is that not what the Congressional Republicans have been doing all along? How is that a new strategy?
It is at this point that Garrow makes his most outlandish suggestion as to how to remove the President from office.
“Frankly, we have sheriffs in the country who, by law, have the right to arrest people. They’re the guys, if someone was going to go in and arrest the President, it would be probably a sheriff along with military to back him up because you still got the Secret Service, you still got people who are there to protect the President, and they have to be contended with. Whether it would be legal or lawful to do it would be answered after the bullets were fired.“
What makes these people so sure that the military are going to ignore the oath they took when they were sworn in and back them in their proposed treasonous acts is and will always remain a mystery.