HomeMost Popular on AATTPMUST READ: This Doctor’s Brilliant Debunking of a Teabagger’s Nazi Gun Meme Will Make Your Day!

MUST READ: This Doctor’s Brilliant Debunking of a Teabagger’s Nazi Gun Meme Will Make Your Day!

When this Facebook user came across yet another post from a pro-gun teabagger with yet another lame, gun control supporters are like Nazis meme, he realized he was really sick and tired of seeing them.

In this case, the poster shared a meme from a user named Cold Dead Hands (after the appendages from which Obummer’s Red Brigade will remove his guns, we presume).  The meme featured a delightful photo of prisoners being imported to Nazi concentration camps back in World War II, with the ominous text:

“History repeats itself, especially when you ignore it.”

Above it, Cold Dead Hands wrote,

“Turn in your guns, they said. We’ll take care of you, they said. Freedom Delivery System: http://bit.ly/1rZZ1ix -AC-“

Alas. we may never have the chance to avail ourselves of the “Freedom Delivery System” so kindly offered, because the link does not work. Perhaps the NSA found the page in question and had Homeland Security take it down. Or, more likely, ColdDeadHands misspelled the link.

Cold Dead Hands; Facebook post:  " Turn in your guns, they said. We'll take care of you, they said. " Followed by pro-gun meme showing people being shuttled off to Nazi concentration camps. History Repeats Itself. Especially when you ignore it.

The user first asked how many law-abiding citizens have had their guns confiscated since President Barack Obama was elected in 2008, to which the teabagger correctly responded, “none.”

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, but it COULD happen, right?

He then brilliantly debunked this Teabagger’s Nazi gun meme, first warning that the Teabagger does NOT get to take credit for the then-Republicans’ emancipation of slaves or blame today’s Democrats for the racism of past southern democrats:

And again with the propagation of Nazi comparisons for you, [name removed]

Hmm… After you have replied with the correct answer of “zero” from my question above, you can then tell me which political party during CURRENT times (that’s right – you don’t get to claim the Democrats of 1861) is overwhelmingly associated with, and supportive of former slave states South of the Mason-Dixon Line who would have considered their current black and Hispanic citizens as “undermenschen?” (To use a Nazi term).

Or how about Liberals or Conservatives? Which group is more closely associated with racial profiling, stereotyping, voter suppression, gerrymandering, ignorance, religious hypocrisy and just plain hatred? That’s correct. Conservatives. You should be 3/3 now

I have to laugh when this post mentions history repeating itself, since conservatives and Fox News sheep warp their own version of “history” and are isolated in their own bubble- in the dark and fed a diet of shit and ignorance. Actual facts and real history be damned! Willful ignorance is bliss.

And by the way, the reason all of the former slave states are Republican now? Because of a backlash and resentment against LBJ (a Democrat) who enacted desegregation and  instituted civil rights. How dare he!

So to backtrack now to the caption, by your logic the solution to this problem in Ferguson (to use a current event) would be to arm these “thugs” (a Fox News euphemism for the N-word), as opposed to limiting certain police powers?

Can’t have it both ways. Logic and facts are a real bitch, as well as being conservative kryptonite.

Here’s the screen shot with the conversation.

Facebook post: And again with the propagation of Nazi comparisons for you, [name removed]  Hmm... After you have replied with the correct answer of "zero" from my question above, you can then tell me which political party during CURRENT times (that's right - you don't get to claim the Democrats of 1861) is overwhelmingly associated with, and supportive of former slave states South of the Mason-Dixon Line who would have considered their current black and Hispanic citizens as "undermenschen?" (To use a Nazi term).  Or how about Liberals or Conservatives? Which group is more closely associated with racial profiling, stereotyping, voter suppression, gerrymandering, ignorance, religious hypocrisy and just plain hatred? That's correct. Conservatives. You should be 3/3 now  I have to laugh when this post mentions history repeating itself, since conservatives and Fox News sheep warp their own version of "history" and are isolated in their own bubble- in the dark and fed a diet of shit and ignorance. Actual facts and real history be damned! Willful ignorance is bliss.  And by the way, the reason all of the former slave states are Republican now? Because of a backlash and resentment against LBJ (a Democrat) who enacted desegregation and  instituted civil rights. How dare he!  So to backtrack now to the caption, by your logic the solution to this problem in Ferguson (to use a current event) would be to arm these "thugs" (a Fox News euphemism for the N-word), as opposed to limiting certain police powers?

Share on RedditShare on LinkedInDigg thisShare on StumbleUponPin on PinterestShare on TumblrShare on Google+Email this to someonePrint this page

About Doctor Brad

  • frogmouth

    Debunking means diverting the discussion from gun control to slavery and civil rights legislation?

    Who knew?

    • majii

      The original post linked gun control to Nazism. This means Cold Dead Hands opened the door, and the person who responded walked through it, adding information related to American history to it. This sometimes happens in the courtroom when a lawyer says a particular thing, decides s/he doesn’t want the other lawyer to discuss it and asks the judge to prevent him/her from doing so. In most cases, the judge permits the lawyer to address the issue because the first one introduced it into the record.

      • frogmouth

        “Your Honor, my client is CLEARLY not guilty of the crime of which he stands accused because decades before he was born, my grandfather, in an entirely different country in another part of the world committed a completely unrelated crime which the prosecutor has, TO THIS DAY, yet to apologize for.”

        Yeah, That’ll work.

        • DGoffNspector

          Your obfuscation is a totally ineffective way to mask your ignorance of the facts.
          But hey, if it works for you…

    • Skip Moreland

      Yes it would have been a far better argument to point out that the nazis did away with the gun control laws the government before had put into place. The nazis encouraged gun ownership and training. And thus the argument would have been over.

      • frogmouth

        The Nazis encouraged gun ownership? Maybe for approved people, but not for Jews.

        I forget…how did that work out for them?

        • Skip Moreland

          It worked out as well as it does for unarmed black males here in this country. The jews were screwed anyways, they couldn’t go up against a modern trained army (modern for it’s day). The only times they were able to organize to fight back, it didn’t matter. Their best defense was to hide and the nazis just took time to root them out.
          But the majority were allowed guns and it didn’t work out very well for them either. But the point that conservatives try to make is that the nazis had gun control for everyone, when they didn’t. Hitler encouraged gun ownership.
          So when gun control laws are targeted to affect only certain ethnics, then you can use the nazi argument.

          • frogmouth

            Ah. The Jews were screwed anyway, so no biggie.

            And to say the Nazi government did not have gun control is disingenuous at best. Citizens were required to have a permit to buy a firearm. Exceptions being government officials and Party members.

            Controlling who can and cannot buy a gun is, by definition, gun control.

          • Skip Moreland

            Rifles and shotguns or longguns as they were called did not require permits. Legal age was dropped to 18 for ownership. Ammo had no restrictions of amount or type. Real tough gun control there.
            Minorities are always screwed when the majority hates them. Just like in this country. It’s never worked out for our minorities either.

          • DGoffNspector

            Every reply I type, I delete and start over, as I get worked up refuting your asinine assertions with facts, and venture into “less polite” discourse.
            So, here’s a link. Educate yourself, unless you simply prefer willful ignorance. In which case, there is no helping you.

            http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4029&context=flr

        • Mary

          So when normal rational people want to not approve certain people, like domestic abusers, felons, mentally ill or challenged idividuals they are Nazis? How would you feel if a contingent of minority gun owners marched down your street? You’d be good with that right?

  • Valk-Orion Yoder

    And this is what a powned tea bagger would have in responce: Derpa Derpa Washington, Derpa Derpa Jesus, Derpa Derpa JIHAD (oh dam sorry I was thinking ISIS for a second) I mean REVOLUTION!!!!!

    • J. Fischer

      Also: New World Order derp derp; Illuminati derp; FREEDOM! Second Amendment! More Guns! (and so on)

    • Sean Huntley

      BENGHAZI!

    • kbdevo1962

      Probably would respond with this too .

      • kbdevo1962

        I’ll try this one more time.

    • ZexyZek

      Cue the Koch Suckers Circus whining about how “liberals gunna take yur gunz!!111!”

Scroll To Top
website security Website Security Test